Evertune alternatives
8 other tools that measure whether AI assistants name your brand, with what each one publishes about price, sampling and uncertainty. Evertune is a research-led pure-play with the deepest disclosed sampling in the category.
We make Standing, which is one of the rows below, and it is labelled. The table sorts by published entry price rather than by our preference, so it opens with Otterly AI at $29/mo, 15 prompts and we appear wherever ours lands. Every figure comes from the vendor's own pricing page, documentation or help centre, verified August 6, 2026. Where a vendor has not published something it says not published, rather than being scored as a zero.
| Tool | Entry price | Billed by | Runs per prompt | Uncertainty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otterly AIThe cheapest serious entry point, aimed at small teams and solo marketers. | $29/mo, 15 prompts | Prompts | Not published | None published |
| Peec AIEuropean pure-play with the best agency workflows in the category. | $95/mo, 50 prompts | Prompts | Not published | None published |
| ProfoundThe best-funded pure-play, built for enterprise brand teams. | $99/mo, 50 prompts | Prompts | 1 per prompt per engine per day | Researched, not shipped |
| Semrush AI ToolkitAI visibility next to the rest of Semrush, on a very large query database. | $99/mo, one domain, 25 prompts | Tracked prompts | Not published | One disclaimer sentence |
| StandingThis is usFixed shared basket, 5 runs per prompt per engine, and a confidence band on every score. | $99/mo, 3 domains | Domains | 5 per prompt per engine (3 free) | 95% band, in the product |
| Scrunch AIPure-play built around how AI crawlers and agents experience your site. | $250/mo, 125 prompt variants | Prompt variants | Not published | None, a waiting period instead |
| AthenaHQCredit-based pure-play with no prompt cap and a large content library. | $295/mo, 3,600 credits | Credits | Not published | None, and missing days are zeroed |
| Ahrefs Brand RadarAI visibility bolted onto the SEO suite many teams already pay for. | Requires an Ahrefs plan | Checks | 1 per prompt per engine per location | None, but instability disclosed |
Why people look for an alternative to Evertune
Three reasons, each one a property of their published product rather than an opinion about it.
- Pricing is not published, so evaluating them starts with a sales call rather than a page.
- Their unique prompt count is not published either: the headline 100,000 prompts counts responses rather than questions.
- With 100 runs per prompt they could publish roughly a ±10 point band at 50% and do not. Statistically significant is used as an adjective, with no null hypothesis, alpha or interval width anywhere.
When to stay with Evertune
You want the deepest sampling available and can work with a vendor that does not publish pricing. On raw sampling depth they are the strongest option in the category.
Where Evertune is genuinely stronger than us:
- Sampling depth, decisively. 100 runs per prompt per model against our 5. This is the one place in the category where a rival is straightforwardly ahead of us on methodology, and it is not close.
- A 150M real-prompt panel for basket generation, and support for up to 250 customer prompts.
- A published methodology page, which most of this category does not have.
The question this table is really about
Two of the five columns matter more than the other three, and they are the two most of this category declines to fill in.
Every tool here asks AI engines a set of questions and reports how often your brand comes up. Answers move between runs, so the same question asked twice can produce two different scores with nothing having changed. How many times a tool asks, and whether it tells you how much of a move was noise, is what separates a measurement from a single draw.
5 of the 9 tools here do not publish a run count at all. Of the ones that do, Evertune samples deepest by a distance, at 100 runs per prompt per model against our 5, and that is on this page because leaving it off would be the same omission we are describing.
Nobody in this table except us publishes a confidence interval in the product. Evertune could: at 100 runs they could report roughly a ±10 point band at 50% and choose not to.
Standing compared with Evertune, directly
You want the uncertainty reported to you rather than absorbed into an unqualified claim of significance.
Standing vs Evertune, head to headAlternatives to the others
Or skip the shortlist and get the number
Every tool on this page sells a subscription before it tells you anything. The free check asks five AI surfaces what they recommend in your category and shows whether you come up, with the confidence band, without an account.