Get and keep reviews on the sites AI names
Profiles claimed, reviews stalled? A monthly program that asks your real customers for reviews on the sites AI assistants read, and drafts your replies. Never gated, never bought.
Not sure this is the right service?
- Requests sent22 · every one listed
- Reviews landed7 · G2 ×4 · Capterra ×3
- Negatives answered same day1 ✓
- Re-scan, same basket✓
- Real customers only
- No gating, ever
- Inside platform rules
- Re-scanned monthly
What you get
A rhythm, not a delivery. The monthly re-scan on the same basket is what shows whether it keeps working.
Get and keep reviews on the sites AI names
$600per month
Delivered monthly, reported monthly.
Start your order- Every platform engines cite in your category, claimed and completed in month one
- Review markup deployed on your own site
- Requests timed to delivered value, inside each platform's rules
- 1 re-scan a month, same basket
- Negative reviews answered the same day, with a draft
What this covers
Measured against your AI answers rather than your star rating, which is the thing you’re actually paying for.
Unhappy customers, same ask
No sentiment screens: the FTC banned gating in 2024 and we decline it regardless.
Replies drafted, negatives same-day
Bad news arrives with a drafted response, not a delay.
The measure is the answers
Whether review platforms show up as sources for your buyers’ questions.
Where this ends
This solicits and answers. Building the profiles first is Review Platform Setup, and the two are usually bought together.
How it works
A single burst reads as a campaign to the customer and to the platform. The rhythm is the product.
- Week 1Requests go out
Timed to delivered value: customers are asked after the product did something for them.
- Weeks 2–3Reviews land
Whatever they say. Replies drafted; negatives answered the same day.
- Week 4Re-scan + report
Every request and review listed, and the same basket re-run.
- MonthlyThe rhythm repeats
A flat month reports flat. Month after month is the shape that keeps working.
What arrives
Every request, every review, and the re-scan, in one monthly report.
Every request on the record
Each one listed with its platform, next to whatever came back.
Bad news, same day
A drafted response for every negative, because silence reads worse than the review.
Answers, not stars
The re-scan asks whether review platforms feed your buyers’ answers, which is the point.
What we stand behind
- A report every month
- Including flat ones: a month with no movement is reported as exactly that.
- Real customers, never gated
- Only people you confirm, never screened by sentiment. FTC 2024, and our own line.
- Inside every platform’s rules
- Every request stays within the platform’s solicitation terms, and every one is listed.
Questions
Because soliciting reviews is a rhythm, not a delivery. A single burst of requests reads as a campaign to the customer and to the platform, and the platforms that matter police exactly that. Requests timed to delivered value, month after month, is the shape that keeps working, and the monthly re-scan on the same basket is what shows whether it is.
Two ways. It only asks customers you confirm are real, and it never screens by sentiment, so unhappy customers get the same request as happy ones. And it is measured against your AI answers rather than against your star rating: the monthly report says whether the review platforms moved from Gap to Earned in the questions your buyers ask, which is the thing you are actually paying for.
Then you get bad reviews and we tell you, with a drafted response. Review gating, which means screening customers and only routing the happy ones to a review form, is illegal under the FTC's 2024 rule and is the single most common practice in this category. We will not do it, and a vendor offering to protect you from your own customers is telling you what they will do to your data later.
On a schedule timed to delivered value rather than in one blast: a customer is asked after the product has done something for them, because that is when a real answer exists. Every request stays inside the platform's own rules on solicitation, and every one sent is listed in the monthly report alongside the reviews that landed.
Every request sent and every review that landed, each with its platform, plus a re-scan of the same question basket you started with. The re-scan is the point: the thing being measured is whether review platforms show up as sources in the answers your buyers see, not whether your star rating moved.
Every request sent and every review landed is listed, with its platform.
The same questions before and after, each with its own confidence band. A move counts once it clears your domain's own drift, which is why the band is published rather than just the score.
Profiles claimed, then reviews arriving and replies drafted. Every request goes to a real customer you have confirmed, on the platform's own terms, and every one sent is listed in the monthly report with whatever came back. Reviews are written by your customers rather than by us, and nobody is screened by sentiment first, because the FTC banned both in 2024.
On the record
“We've been focused on SEO for years, so I was initially skeptical about adding another tool. But seeing how differently AI platforms talk about our company compared to Google search was pretty eye-opening. Standing makes that difference much easier to see. I particularly like being able to track competitors and see what sources are being cited.”
Keep the reviews arriving.
$600 per month. Real customers, platform rules, re-scanned monthly.