25% for 12 months, and the terms are on this page
For the people who write the roundups, run the agencies, and get asked which AI visibility tool is worth paying for. If you are going to recommend one, you should be able to read the terms before you ask us for them.
- Commission
- 25%
- Duration
- 12 mo
- Held for
- 30d
The terms
25% of subscription revenue, for 12 months
On $99/mo that is $24.75 a month, and on $299/mo it is $74.75. Twelve months rather than "for life", because lifetime revenue share is easy to promise at zero customers and expensive to honour later, and a term we would want to change is worse for you than a shorter one we will keep.
Paid after 30 days
Matching the money-back guarantee on annual plans. Paying sooner would mean occasionally clawing money back from you when somebody refunds, which is a worse experience than waiting a month.
First touch, not last
If somebody arrives on your link, leaves, and comes back through a search two days later, you are still credited. Last-click attribution would quietly hand your referrals to Google, and we know that because our own analytics were built to answer this question.
Services are not included
The commission is on the self-serve subscriptions only, not on audits, placements or retainers. Those are delivered by hand and priced close to the cost of delivering them, so there is no margin in them to share and we would rather say that than invent one.
What does not exist yet
Stated here rather than discovered by you in month one.
There is no partner dashboard and no automated payout. Codes are issued by hand, referrals are reconciled by hand, and you will be paid by transfer. At the number of partners we have, which is currently none, that is the honest amount of machinery.
There is also no anonymous signup, and there will not be. Every code belongs to somebody we can name. There is an active scam in this category emailing businesses fabricated AI visibility scores and asking for money to fix them, and a company selling measurement integrity cannot hand out untraceable links to it.
Before you recommend us, read the part where we lose
You are putting your name on the recommendation, so the useful thing we can give you is not a pitch.
Our comparison pages open with where each rival beats us, and one of them beats us badly: Evertune samples 100 runs per prompt against our 5, and it says so in the first section of their page. The alternatives table sorts by published price rather than by our preference, so it opens with a competitor and we appear fifth of nine.
If a roundup needs a line about where we are weak, take it from there rather than writing around it. A recommendation that concedes something is worth more to your readers, and it is the only kind we would want to be in.
8 head-to-head comparisons, each written from the vendor's own published documentation.
Ask for a code
Use the contact form and say where you would use it. We will send a code and the link format, and we will tell you honestly if we think your audience is wrong for this, because a referral that does not convert wastes your slot rather than ours.