Compare AI visibility tools
Every claim comes from the vendor's own pricing, docs or help center, and each page opens with where that vendor beats us. Evertune beats us twenty to one on sampling depth.
- Tools compared
- 10
- Claims verified
- Aug 2026
We make Standing, so weigh these accordingly. Every figure comes from the vendor's own pricing, docs or help center, verified August 6, 2026.
- StandingvsProfound
- Entry
- $99/mo, 50 prompts
- Runs per prompt
- 1 per prompt per engine per day
- Uncertainty
- Researched, not shipped
Where they winFull comparisonFar more mature product surface: crawler analytics, content agents and conversation-corpus prompt generation that we do not have.
- StandingvsPeec AI
- Entry
- $95/mo, 50 prompts
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- None published
Where they winFull comparisonGenuinely good agency tooling and multi-client workflows, which we do not have yet.
- StandingvsOtterly AI
- Entry
- $29/mo, 15 prompts
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- None published
Where they winFull comparisonPrice. $29/mo with 15 prompts is below anything we offer and below most of the category.
- StandingvsAhrefs Brand Radar
- Entry
- Requires an Ahrefs plan
- Runs per prompt
- 1 per prompt per engine per location
- Uncertainty
- None, but instability disclosed
Where they winFull comparisonIf you already pay for Ahrefs, this is included, and the marginal cost of adding it is zero.
- StandingvsSemrush AI Toolkit
- Entry
- $99/mo, one domain, 25 prompts
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- One disclaimer sentence
Where they winFull comparisonThe rest of Semrush, and an existing seat most marketing teams already have.
- StandingvsAthenaHQ
- Entry
- $295/mo, 3,600 credits
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- None, and missing days are zeroed
Where they winFull comparisonFar more content and a much larger site, including 83 industry pages.
- StandingvsScrunch AI
- Entry
- $250/mo, 125 prompt variants
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- None, a waiting period instead
Where they winFull comparisonAgent-experience analysis of how AI crawlers see a site, which is a genuinely different angle.
- StandingvsEvertune
- Entry
- Not published
- Runs per prompt
- 100 per prompt per model
- Uncertainty
- None published
Where they winFull comparisonSampling depth, decisively. 100 runs per prompt per model against our 5. This is the one place in the category where a rival is straightforwardly ahead of us on methodology, and it is not close.
- StandingvsHubSpot AEO
- Entry
- $50/mo, 25 prompts
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- None published
Where they winFull comparisonDistribution, decisively. It ships inside a CRM that a very large number of businesses already use, and it is bundled free into Marketing Hub Pro and Enterprise. Most buyers will meet it without looking for it.
- StandingvsGEOHATS
- Entry
- $47 once, 3 sites
- Runs per prompt
- Not published
- Uncertainty
- Not published
Where they winFull comparisonLifetime pricing at $47 is a genuinely different offer from every monthly tracker here, and for a solo founder tracking three sites it is the cheapest way into this category by a wide margin.
Still building the shortlist?
The whole field in one table, sorted by published entry price rather than by our preference. Or, if you have not decided to buy anything yet, Standing vs doing nothing.
Compare the whole field